Game theory and discourse anaphora

نویسندگان

  • Robin Clark
  • Prashant Parikh
چکیده

We develop an analysis of discourse anaphora—the relationship between a pronoun and an antecedent earlier in the discourse—using games of partial information. The analysis is extended to include information from a variety of different sources of information, including lexical semantics, contrastive stress, grammatical relations and decision theoretic aspects of the context. In this paper, we will develop a game theoretic treatment of some simple cases of discourse anaphora.1 Our attention will be mainly focused on short texts of the type shown in (1): (1) a. A cop saw a hoodlum. He yawned. b. A cop saw a hoodlum. He chased him. The simple texts in (1) have the interesting property that, all else being equal, the pronouns in the second sentence are taken by most speakers to be unambiguous. For example, the pronoun he in (1)a preferentially refers to the cop and not to the hoodlum. Equally in (1)b, he tends to refer to the cop and him refers to the hoodlum, and not the other way around. It is useful to compare anaphors across sentences with those that occur inside a sentence, something we will not treat in this paper. Consider in this light (2): (2) The priest told John his pants were on fire. It is our judgment that the pronoun his in (2) is fully ambiguous; the pronoun can pick out either the priest or John with little or no bias for one or the other. This intuition contrasts sharply with the intuitions about the pronouns in (1). Indeed, a speaker who wishes to refer to the hoodlum, and not the cop, in the subject of the next clause, would do well to use a definite description: ∗ Both authors wish to thank Richard Breheny and Bill Labov for valuable comments made on an earlier draft of this paper. † I acknowledge the generous support of a grant from the NIH, grant NS44266. 1 On a game theoretic approach to language, see Parikh (2001), Parikh (2006) or Parikh & Clark (2005). Myerson (1991) gives a good overview of analytic game theory. c © 2006 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. jolli.tex; 3/03/2006; 21:02; p.1

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Universität DortmundContents

Nick Asher: (Invited): Constraints in Discourse: Part of a more general theory of rationality? SDRT promotes two central ideas relevant to constraints in discourse: (1) dynamic semantic update is constrained by discourse structure; (2) discourse coherence is a scalar phenomenon and so discourse structure construction should proceed by maximizing discourse coherence given the resources available...

متن کامل

Plural Anaphora in Property-theoretic Discourse Theory

It is possible to use a combination of classical logic and dependent types to represent natural language discourse and singular anaphora (Fox, 1994a). In this paper, these ideas are extended to account for some cases of plural anaphora. In the theory described, PT D , universal quantiication and conditionals give rise to a context in which singular referents within its scope are transformed int...

متن کامل

Recoverability Optimality Theory: Discourse Anaphora in a Bidirectional framework

In this work we explore the possibility of formalizing explanations based in the notion “deletion under recoverability”: information should be omitted in expressions if that information can be recovered without being overtly expressed – e.g., from information already encoded in the state of the discourse. This style of explanation is difficult to formalize for many reasons, among them that the ...

متن کامل

Motivations And Implications Of Veins Theory

The paper deals with the cohesion part of a model of global discourse interpretation, usually known as Veins Theory (VT). By taking from the Rhetorical Structure Theory the notions of nuclearity and relations, but ignoring the relations’ names, VT computes from rhetorical structures strings of discourse units, called veins, from which domains of accessibility can be determined for each discours...

متن کامل

Motivations And Implications Of Veins Theory. Cohesion

The paper deals with the cohesion part of a model of global discourse interpretation, usually known as Veins Theory (VT). By taking the notion of nuclearity (though ignoring relations), from the Rhetorical Structure Theory, VT computes strings of discourse units, called veins, from which domains of accessibility can be determined for each discourse unit. VT’s constructs best fit with an increme...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of Logic, Language and Information

دوره 16  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007